Tergiversations. It’s a real word: tergiversate means ‘to change repeatedly one’s attitude or opinions with respect to a subject or cause.’
Richard Gabriel, “Patterns of Software”.
I nearly called this blog “Tergiversations”, after an essay by Richard Gabriel in his book “Patterns of Software“. It’s a very important book to me. I found the book in a bargain bin in the academic bookstore on my university campus at the end of my first year. At this time I was considering if Computer Science was the correct choice of course for me, or if I should do something completely different, perhaps in Arts & Humanities.
Gabriel’s book affirmed my course choice. In it, I saw someone who clearly loved his subject matter and was capable of deep insight into it. There was no doubt that Computer Science contained serious challenges and was worthy of anyone’s attention. More than this, I saw there was a very subjective side to the field, and that people’s imaginations – even their force of character – were of vital importance (of course, now I realise that this is probably true of most scientific subjects, but it was a revelation to me then).
The book itself is a series of essays, its title coming from an essay exploring how the ideas in Christopher Alexander’s books “The Timeless Way of Building” and “A Pattern Language” apply to software. It also contains essays on writing, programming languages and some more personal stuff. All are worth reading.
I wanted to call the blog “Tergiversations” to show that I was willing to listen to others and change my viewpoints accordingly. For me, one of the most striking differences between science and other disciplines is a willingness to concede, to accept that someone else’s theory is correct and yours isn’t. Of course, this largely occurs because many things in science can be objectively proven; you can’t argue about the existence of a black swan. At least in science, objective progress can be made, in artistic or political endeavour any progress tends to be subjective. I could argue all day against the BNP, but I couldn’t prove beyond doubt that their beliefs are misguided and immoral. However, I can easily prove that my Java code runs twice as fast as yours. (Interestingly, I recently read an article where these two worlds collided, and I’m just glad I don’t have to deal with Andy Schlafly)
In the end, I didn’t name the blog “Tergiversations”; it has the negative connotations of being evasive and desertion, whereas all I wanted to indicate was a willingness to change one’s mind and to try new methods (I’m sure Richard is well aware of this; I failed to remember the precise definition and the context he used it in until I re-read the essay).
To sum up; many thanks to Richard Gabriel for writing “Patterns of Software”, and welcome to “Feeding the Bit-Bucket”.